two housewives, “founders of tea party movement”
I’d always wondered whether or not ordinary housewives could run the country. Looks like last night’s election proved that they can. Evidently we can do the extraordinary, when we decide to put our passion and energies behind a task. I’m sure all women will agree that’s a “no-brainer.” When wives and moms decide to do something, they do it, like Margaret Whitman, creator of the multi-billion dollar business, E-Bay.
Sarah Palin’s first brush with the media was as a beauty queen. Setting her sights on politics, she became mayor of little known Wasila, and then governor of Alaska, and then GOP candidate for VP. While she and McCain lost the presidential election, Palin landed back in front of the cameras. While she may not have been the media’s darling then, mainstream reporters seem to be back pedaling now. This morning on CNN, the political spin-meisters spoke of her as a force with which to be reckoned, especially in the 2012 election. OMG, I thought! Talk about going the “way the wind blows.”
I’m a liberal, too compassionate to turn my back on those needing a “hand-up.” My husband and I, both from large families, 12 and 9 siblings, respectively, are inclined to “give back,” and “pay it forward.” But I do understand the frustration of those on the unemployment lines, those who are barely making “ends meet,” those whose homes are “under water” because of foreclosures next door, those whose businesses are struggling, those who want a balanced budget, those who want less government, and those of us on Main Street who are fed up with the millionaires on Wall Street. Might I just add here, why are we still making millionaires of athletes, and celebrities, and doctors ”playing” the Medicare system? I’d just as soon take all the money we’re pouring into these peoples’ pockets, and help the homeless, the abused, those unable to get health insurance.
While I may disagree with conservative efforts to take the country backwards, I have to applaud Amy Kremer and Jenny Beth Martin, Atlanta housewives who are the geniuses behind the Tea Party movement. According to the Wall Street Journal’s ”Birth of a Movement-Tea Party Arose from Conservatives Steeped in Crisis,” on 10/29, both women “were 30-something suburbanites…frustrated by recession, dismayed by the election of Barack Obama and waiting for the next chapter of their lives.” Quitting her career as a Delta flight attendant to raise her daughter, Kremer turned to blogging after becoming an empty-nester, ”one on gardening, one on politics. ‘I had this empty space in my life’… Ms. Martin, a software manager by training and part-time blogger, was cleaning houses to help pay the bills after her husband’s temporary-staffing business collapsed. They were in danger of losing their home.” Martin was enraged after Senator Saxby Chambliss, in whose campaign she had been a volunteer, voted in favor of President Bush’s bail out of Wall Street banks. In her estimation, ” ‘Sometimes it stinks when your business goes bad. But it’s part of our system….The government doesn’t need to come in and hold a business up and keep it from failing.’ “
In the span of a few weeks in February and March 2009, the two women met on a conference call and helped found the first major national organization in the tea-party movement. Within months, they became two of the central figures in the most dynamic force in U.S. politics this year.
Ms. Kremer, 39, currently chairs the political action committee known as the Tea Party Express. It has raised millions of dollars for upstart candidates and engineered the campaign that threatens Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). Once shy about public speaking, today she crisscrosses the country addressing thousands at a time. ‘Are you ready to fire Harry Reid?’ Ms. Kremer bellowed to a crowd of 2,000 in Reno, Nev., this month.
Ms. Martin, 40, is national coordinator of the Tea Party Patriots, an umbrella group claiming affiliation with nearly 3,000 local groups around the U.S. Leaving her young son and daughter at home, she is on a 30-city tour, revving up activists for the victory she is counting on next Tuesday.
‘This was something I had to do,’ Ms. Martin says. ‘There were just so many of us who were fed up with the Republican Party.’
Comprised mostly of middle-aged, middle-class citizens with little political experience, “a braid of many strands of discontent and passion, ranging from opposition to illegal immigration and a national sales tax to support for gun rights. A vocal faction questioning Mr. Obama’s legal eligibility to be president provided another source of grassroots fuel.” If John McCain’s campaign was a “babe” in the internet “woods,” the Tea Party political machine seems hell-bent on giving Obama’s proven internet savvy a “run for its money” in 2012.
Many conservatives felt Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign had never fully exploited the Internet to raise money and unite disparate activists. The Obama team had proven deft at harnessing technology.
And so the TEA PARTY MOVEMENT was born online, in the internet universe.
- Michael Patrick Leahy, a Nashville technology consultant, built a network of like-minded activists
- Eric Odom, among the above, compiled a large list of activists “through a group working to lift the offshore-drilling ban”
- Stacy Mott, started a blog for conservative women, “Smart Girl Politics,” launching a website by the same name which drew in Kremer and Martin from Atlanta
- Keli Carender, arranged the first protest, drawing 120 like-minded activists, after it was broadcast on a local talk-radio show and written up online by Fox news consultant Michelle Malkin
- On 2/19/09, in response to the $75 billion dollar bailout for homeowners unable to pay their mortgages, CNBC financial commentator Rick Santanelli started the “rant” when, broadcasting live from the Chicago Board of Trade, exclaimed ‘This is America! …How many of you people want to pay for your neighbor’s mortgage that has an extra bathroom and can’t pay their bills?’ To the cheers of traders behind him, he continued ‘We’re thinking of having a Chicago Tea Party in July’… “The rant went viral.”
- After massive internet organizing among all of the above parties, 50 rallies occurred simultaneously nationwide. Within a year, 2,000 local tea party groups were formed around the country.
- Wealthy interests threw their support behind the movement, like Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, “groups born from a conservative think tank formed in the 1980s by members of the Koch family, who run oil-and-gas conglomerate Koch Industries Inc.”
- On 4/12/10, Kremer said she wasn’t boasting in claiming ’I started this’ when she began a social-networking website called “Tea Party Patriots,” the name her husband recommended.
- Enter the media. Fox TV’s Glenn Beck “launched his own initiative, the 9/12 project,” as well as touted the Tea Party’s 4/15 rallies, as did Sean Hannity, and blogger Malkin.
- Hundreds of thousands of “tea partiers” “gathered in city halls, at post offices, at town squares, parks, and along busy streets.
- The “Tea Party Express” was formed when Sal Russo, Reagan’s adviser in the 60s and 70s, re-energized a 2008 political action committee, Our Country Deserves Better, as a “tea-party-themed group.” With Joe Wierzbicki, a colleague, they spread the word on a cross-country bus tour. In 2 years the newly christened group raised more than $7 million.
- Tea Party Patriots, among them Kremer and Martin, maintained a nonpartisanship stance, preferring to stand for issues, and not endorsing specific candidates. On the other hand, Tea Party Express “wanted to raise money for candidates and engineer campaigns.”
The break between the two factions of the Tea Party movement, found its momentun when Obama pushed for massive, health-care reform.
- FreedomWorks, in its “Healthcare Freedom Action Kit,” suggested ways to omit socialized medicine from the budget.
- A Patriot coached members on how to “Rock-the-boat…’Watch for an opportunity to yell out and challenge’ the representative. ‘The goal is to rattle him.’ “
- The Patriots, except for Kremer, declined to participate in the Express’ first bus tour, since the groups had different philosophies.
- Taking part in the D.C. rally organized by Beck’s “9 1/2 Project,” which drew 75,000, Kremer returned home ” ‘a changed person…I didn’t need to stand in the shadows of Jenny Beth Martin and Mark Meckler (activist and Grass Valley, California Internet marketer and attorney)…I felt good about myself.’ “
- Prominent Florida physician and tea-party activist David McKalip whipped up a storm when he Googled “a doctored image of Mr. Obama as a a tribal witch doctor with a bone through his nose…” In an email to the Wall Street Journal, he publicly apologized. Kremer defended him, to the dismay of other Patriots. ” ‘David, we all support you fully and are here for you…I can assure you of one thing and that is we will protect our own. We all have your back, my friend.’ “
- In August 2009, the Tea Party incorporated with a 4 person board, Ms. Martin, Ms. Kremer, Mr. Meckler and Rob Neppell, a conservative blogger. “But relations quickly deteriorated…Ms. Kremer indicated she had hired her own lawyers and might try to claim ownership of the group’s intellectual property, according to an affidavit from Ms. Martin. A few weeks later, she was voted off the board.”
- Kremer shifted to the Tea Party Express, urging it to back Scott Brown, for the Senate seat vacated by Edward Kennedy.







yeah,I just thought you might want to know that your blog is messed up when you view it on my iphone. I?m not sure if it has something to do with my phone?s browser or your website? just saying…
Sorry. I’m not sure what to tell you. Hope it doesn’t discourage you from returning to my blog site, though. No onelse has made the same comment, so am not sure what the technical problem is. I’ll see if wordpress.com has any idea. Thanks for letting me know…hugmamma.
Absolutely grateful for both your comments, Ben and Andy! Thank you for providing personal insight, based upon your own experiences. Comments are always welcome, especially when they enlighten me. Yours certainly did. My impressions have obviously been from my own experiences, which do not speak for everyonelse’s.
We all know people with different situations, some taking advantage of government assistance, while others depend upon it, through no fault of their own. I guess I err on the side of those who, with their children, might be on the streets. I wouldn’t want to see them “fall through the cracks,” if help was removed.
And again, growing up in my own impoverished home, with so many mouths to feed, was pretty hard on my widowed mom. She figured out how to survive, with haphazard help from wherever she got it. But it took an emotional and physical toll on her, from age 30, when my dad died. The cruelest being, the deletorious effect on her children, and our dysfunctional relationship with her.
My brother, Ben, always speaks his mind. I welcome that, as I do anyonelse who states their position as clearly, and factually, as you do, Andy. Liberal, or Conservative, both have their share of compassionate people. From its inception, I have tried to speak on behalf of that quality in my blog. Rather than focus upon the masses, I tend to relate to individuals. So when I spoke of compassion in this political context, it was to address the politicians who seem to rile the masses. In all the brouhaha, everyone is lumped together,
“us against them.” The problem is “them” includes those who live on the bottomost rungs of society, not by choice, but by the way their lives have played out. What do we do about the 13 million people who didn’t have health care before, and those who will now have it taken away when the Conservatives overturn the Health Care Program? I don’t know all the answers, but I am concerned about those in serious need.
Again, I appreciate your having apprised me of your compassion, and generosity toward the less fortunate. It’s good to know that what the media reports, and what the politicians say for public consumption is not the sum total of the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. There’s always a story, behind the story.
hugs for your story…hugmamma.
Did not mean for the previous post to say “anonymous”….it’s me….Andy!
I have to agree with Ben. The following statement is (I hope) not well thought out: “I’m a liberal, too compassionate to turn my back on those needing a “hand-up.”
If “compsssion” defines a liberal, then I am a liberal. I work in the health care field and get the opportunity to be compassionate on a daily basis; taking care of people at their most vulnerable. Some of these patients feel I am their doormat, and treat me as such, but the majority appreciate my care and expertise. I treat both camps the same.
My husband and I donate thousands of dollars a year to organizations who give people a “hand up” from bad situations.
I volunteer hundreds of hours per year on my township rescue squad and a community food bank.
My kids are volunteers as well, most notably in the armed services, but growing up they also volunteered for the township fire department, food banks, and other organizations for various periods of time.
I feel we are “compassionate” people, who have raised compassionate kids who will give back to the community in many ways…maybe I AM a liberal… my friends come from many backgrounds, races, religions and sexual orientations.
BUT, it still makes my blood boil when someone in my circle of “friends” defaults on their mortgage because of the bailout, and moves into a larger house in a better neighborhood, leaving the government to take care of their old responsibilty.
It annoys me when someone is waiting for their $500.00 per week unemployment check to run out in order to look for a job.
Does this make me a “conservative” and less compassionate than a “liberal”?
Stereotyping people into only 2 groups is unfair and unrealistic.
This is an excerpt from an article written by George Will that I found quite interesting, altho there IS some stereotyping involved:
” If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:
– Although liberal families’ incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).
– Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.
– Residents of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 gave smaller percentages of their incomes to charity than did residents of states that voted for George Bush.
– Bush carried 24 of the 25 states where charitable giving was above average.
– In the 10 reddest states, in which Bush got more than 60 percent majorities, the average percentage of personal income donated to charity was 3.5. Residents of the bluest states, which gave Bush less than 40 percent, donated just 1.9 percent.
– People who reject the idea that “government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality” give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition”
In reference to Ben’s remark about Al Gore’s charitable giving, I found in my reading the fact that in 2007 Al Gore contributed 0.2 % of his salary to charity. FYI
Maybe I am neither a conservative OR a liberal,
just…Andy!
It is unfortunate that we conservatives are always labeled as “cold-hearted” and “uncaring”. Did you know that in 2007, Al Gore and I contributed the same amount to charity? Does that make me a “liberal” or does it make Al Gore a “conservative”? Every so often I run across a homeless person who asks for money to buy a meal. Instead of giving him/her money, I offer to buy that person a meal instead. 4 out of 5 times I am turned down.
Here in southern Cal we are inundated with the “homeless” but, what I find very interesting is that, I have yet to see an Asian or Hispanic homeless person. I assume that the reason for that is that Asians take care of each other and Hispanics will accept any kind of work. Why is that?
About 4 years ago, I was invited to a luncheon in Honolulu that was put on by the Honolulu Police Dept. It was a kickoff luncheoan for an outreach program to the growing problem of “homelessness” in Hawaii. There were all kinds of important people in attendance. From the director of the Dept. of Health (We sat at the same table) to the State Sheriff.I was there to represent an organization calle Kau Kau Wagon who provided free meals to the homeless (run by a good friend of mine).
There were two special guest there. Their title was “homeless activists’. After the luncheon, I had a chance to talk with them and found out some interesting things. The woman who, I would say was in her late twenties was caucasion and moved from Southern Cal (we had things in common to talk about) about two hears before. She had a degree in psychology from Cal Berkley. She moved to Hawaii to study the cultural traditions of the Polynesians and just enjoy paradise (that’s what she told me). Her associate was a black gentleman from Chicago and she was pregnant with his baby. They were both unemployed and, from what I gathered, that was the lifestyle they wanted. As long as the working people of Hawaii paid for that lifestyle. I’m sorry but, that ticked me off to no end. I wanted to tear that guy’s head off and shove it where the sun doesn’t shine.
One rule we conservatives follow. Give a man a fish and, you feed him for a day. TEACH him to fish and, you feed him for the rest of his life.
I like this blog, though . . . . .Aloha